INDEX PCB Digest - 1/31/02
    ______________________________________________
    1) Press Release - 1/29/02` - Witmer Allowing U.S. Companies to Target Northern Ontario for Hazardous Waste Imports
    2) Summary of Quebec Delegation Meetings - January 25-26, 2002
    3) Temiskaming Speaker - 1/30/02 - Front Page
    Quebec brings BEI concerns to Temiskaming
    4) Temiskaming Speaker - 1/30/02 - Editorial Page
    Letters to the Editor
    5) Northern Daily News - 1/30/02 - Editorial Page
    Letter to the Editor
    6) Northern Daily News - 1/31/02 - Page 3
    Ramsay looks into Bennett
    ______________________________________________
    1)  Press Release - 1/29/02
     
    For Immediate Release
    January 29, 2002
     
    Witmer Allowing U.S. Companies to
    Target Northern Ontario for Hazardous Waste Imports
     
    Kirkland Lake -- Environment Minister Elizabeth Witmer's promise to strengthen Ontario s lax hazardous waste import policies is little more than double-speak on the leadership campaign trail. That s the charge being
    made by Temiskaming residents after learning that a New Jersey company is helping to finance a hazardous waste incinerator in Northern Ontario.
     
    IT Corporation of New Jersey has provided Bennett Environmental with a $3 million loan to help build a PCB incinerator in Kirkland Lake. In exchange for taking the money, Bennett has promised to burn up to 30,000 tonnes a year of contaminated soil from the New Jersey corporation.
     
    Terry Graves, spokesperson for Public Concern Temiskaming, points out that even though this hazardous waste incinerator will be the largest of its kind in Canada, Witmer's Environment Ministry is exempting the project from full public hearings or even an independent peer review.
     
    "Ontario residents are being asked to import risk from across North America," says Graves. "US and Mexican companies will be invited to burn toxic compounds in Ontario, and then they'll get to dump the leftover soils
    which are still contaminated with heavy metals. Meanwhile the citizens of this province are being muzzled by the EA process."
     
    Witmer has come under fire for her Ministry's lax standards following a amning report by Environment Commissioner Gord Miller. In the report, Miller states that Ontario is becoming a magnet for hazardous waste
    shipments because its standards are lower than in Quebec and the United States. Witmer, who is also running to be Ontario's next premier, has promised to improve Ontario s standards.
     
    Graves says Witmer's promise is hollow. "Toxic waste flows to the jurisdiction with the lowest standards," says Graves. "While she's campaigning, we're facing an a massive influx of U.S. hazardous waste into
    our region. Thanks to our own Ministry of Environment, nothing could be easier than siting a hazardous waste incinerator for U.S. waste in Ontario."
     
    -30-
     
    For more information, contact:
     
    Terry Graves (705) 647-7307
     
    ===============================================
    Northwatch                           Acting Together Today - for Tomorrow!
    Box 282
    North Bay                             tel 705 497 0373     fax 705 476 7060
     
    P1B 8H2                              email   [email protected]
     
    ______________________________________________
    2) Summary of Quebec Delegation Meetings - January 25-26, 2002
     
    Concerned Citizens of Temiskaming:
     
    The visit by four people from Quebec was highly successful. There is now a much larger awareness of the risks and impacts of incineration both in Quebec and here in Ontario. There were some good media stories and I understand that the story hit the provincial level of news in Quebec with CBC French Radio and Television. The local newspaper in the St. Ambroise area picked up a Canadian Press story on the meetings in its Saturday edition. There will be additional impacts in the future since Global Television taped the meetings in preparation for a future feature on the issue of incineration.
     
    There were also some new relationships forged during the trip with the people from Quebec as well as French media people. We learned that while many people understand the threat of dioxin due to its toxic mobile nature, some people prefer to believe it is a local problem that will not affect them. There is more work to be done in this area.
     
    Trip Review
     
    Elise Gauthier, Jean-Marc Brisson, Monique Laberge and Renee Dubois arrived in Rouyan, had lunch, and then proceeded to two separate press conferences in Rouyan at the local CJEP (community college) with Canadian Press, Radio Canada and two local press representatives.
     
    Both press conferences were in French. The major message was that while incineration and the release of contaminants to the environment was a problem in Ontario, the people of Quebec, however, had a role to play in informing their government through their Ministry of the Environment, that they did not want to take risks and the project should be stopped.
     
    The events in Quebec were all organized and hosted by Jean Chamberlain with the Rouyan based CREAT (Conseil régional de l'environnement de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue) group. On the way to Ville Marie, a phone interview was held with the CBC and Renee Dubois which was carried on the CBC news shortly there after.
     
    The meeting in Ville Marie was organized by Union Paysanne (Davis Martineau and Lise Chartrand), an international farm based rural development group with members in Quebec. This group will be working with us in the future on common environmental and rural development issues. There are applications for membership to Union Paysanne that describe the direction and intent of this international organization.
     
    On Friday night, the guests were hosted by John and Fran Nychuk, and on Saturday morning, they attended a public meeting in Earlton.
     
    This meeting was a bilingual meeting with Richard Carrier translating questions. People learned of Bennett's attempt to shut up the opponents of their proposal with an injunction against them. They also learned about the impacts on the small farm community since Bennett had come to town. Families were divided and farmers lost business because they were unable to ensure customers that there was no contamination. A single test for PCB's would cost $1000 which makes it impractical for the farm community to test. People also heard of the contamination of the 3.2 square kilometers of land around the plant. The also learned of the promise of 35-40 and 50-70 trucking jobs. The real economic impact is17 part time jobs paying $10-12 per hour with forced high turnovers once people were exposed to PCBs. All of the trucking jobs except one, are done by American truck drivers.
     
    The Kirkland lake meeting went as well as could be expected in Kirkland Lake. There were about four supporters of the projects that attempted to drive home some points. They were given adequate time to do so, but in my view failed as Elise had some very effective responses. For example, when one speaker attempted to corner Elise with a statement that everyone looked healthy and that there appeared to be no health impacts, Elise replied with, how did he know that they were healthy. The man stammered and then sat down.
     
    The turnout was respectable with two councillors from Kirkland Lake and about 120 people.
     
    Some very good points were made. We learned that there is no emergency plan or publication of "emergency releases" and that the public was not aware of them until months later, when freedom of information forced the publication. Another point was that incineration is a sunset business and that there are safer alternatives available involving batch processes that could be operated in a mobile manner and without impact to the environment. Bennett appears to be the only company in North America that is pushing this cheap and dirty technology. The US has not put in a toxic waste incinerator in seven years as the American emission standards have been improved to the point that no incinerator can meet them.
     
    There is additional work to be done over the next few weeks as we ramp up the local, provincial and international campaign against toxic waste incineration.
     
    Ambrose Raftis
    Public Concern Temiskaming
     
    ______________________________________________
    3) Temiskaming Speaker - 1/30/02 - Front Page
    Quebec brings BEI concerns to Temiskaming
     
    by Diane Johnston
    Speaker Reporter
     
    EARLTON -
     
    Several residents living near a Quebec operation similar to a hazardous waste treatment plant proposed for Kirkland Lake had warnings for Temiskaming.
     
    Pollutants in the soil, health worries, and community divisions have followed the start up of a Bennett Environmental Inc. (BEl) plant in St-Ambroise, say the Regroupement régional de citoyennes et citoyens pour la sauvegarde de l'environnement (Citizens for safeguarding the environment).
     
    But BEI's vice president says many of their concerns are unsubstantiated.
     
    The four spoke to more than 110 people in Earlton January 26.
     
    Speaking for the most part through a translator, they said they hoped to save Temiskaming the time, money and struggle they've endured.
     
    "Why do we fight? It's for our kids, it's not for us. It's for our kids so they will live in a world, that is clean," said Renée Dubois, president of the group.
     
    The residents live in and around St Ambroise and Jonquière, located about 15 kilometres to the southeast, in the Lac St-Jean region.
     
    The plant, Récoupère Sol, opened in February, 1998, in St-Ambroise.
     
    It uses a two stage, high temperature process to treat soils and materials contaminated by a variety of substances, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
     
    BEl proposes to build a similar but larger plant in Kirkland Lake.
     
    The St-Ambroise area residents say they're worried about the impact of emissions from the plant.
     
    But many of their concerns are unsubstantiated, said Danny Ponn, BEl vice-president and chief operating officer, earlier this week.
     
    SOIL IMPACTS
     
    Group spokesperson Élise Gauthier cited a finding by the regional public health department that pollutants had been located within a one kilometre radius of the plant after only 300 days of operation.
     
    After reviewing a study commissioned by BEl, the regional public health directorate concluded that emissions from the stack were the source of very light amounts of lead, mercury, cadmium, dioxins and furans in neighbouring forest soils. But Mr. Ponn said the BEl study also found non-detectable levels of PCBs and a contaminant found in wood preservative - two of the substances in the soil treated by the plant.
     
    The dioxins and furans identified in the soil also differ from the specific types produced in the plant's test bum emissions, he said.
     
    Given the number of smelters in I the industrialized Saguenay region, "there are many, many sources of these chemicals," he said.
     
    But Mr. Ponn acknowledged the consultant's report merits further review.
     
    "We need to clarify a few things," he said.
     
    He said BEl has volunteered to do long-term ambient air monitoring in the Saguenay area every other year, beginning this year.
     
    He said one of the dilemmas is the absence of a baseline study that assessed the state of the soil prior to the plant's start up. But it was not required by the Quebec environment ministry, he said.
     
    (At an information session earlier this month in Kirkland Lake, he described the lack of baseline testing on BEI's part an oversight, and a lesson from which it has learned.)
     
    He said the latest study will serve almost as that baseline test for the St. Ambroise area.
     
    ECONOMICS
     
    Jean-Marc Brisson, vice president of the St Ambroise group, is a horticultural producer growing strawberries. In May 2000, he was elected a municipal councillor in StAmbroise after campaigning against the plant.
     
    He told the Earlton audience that the impact of the plant's emissions on his farm produce is difficult to assess without expensive testing.
    .
    In the early days of the plant's operation, he said customers did question him about the safety of his produce. Concern has since declined.
     
    But he said he has lost local sales to customers who support the Récoupère Sol plant, and take issue with his opposition to it.
     
    He added he has no way to measure the business he has lost because prospective customers fear his produce may be tainted.
     
    Ms. Gauthier said the plant has failed to live up to economic expectations.
     
    She told the Earlton audience that only 17 to 20 of 35 promised jobs had materialized. Labourers working inside the plant earn an hourly wage of only $10 to $12, she said.
     
     
    But Mr. Ponn offered different figures. He said its work force was not at capacity during the plant's first year, when it actually operated only about 75 days.
     
    But he said employment now stands at 32 or 33. He said the lowest paid employees - about five to eight - earn $12.75 per hour. Wages for the remainder range up to $18 per hour.
     
    The group also noted that BEI has been charged with environmental infractions even before it started operations.
     
    Mr. Ponn said the company faces three charges relating to the import of contaminated concrete for use at a test burn at the plant.
     
    He said the plant had permission to import the concrete, but was charged over regulations defining size restrictions. Final arguments in the case are expected to be heard later this spring, he said.
     
    ______________________________________________
    4) Temiskaming Speaker - 1/30/02 - Editorial Page
    Letters to the Editor
     
    Building an Incinerator
    Dear Editor:
     
    The Honourable Elizabeth Witmer has banned the burning of medical waste, why not hazardous wastes?
     
    The risks related to incineration are not well known to the residents of Temiskaming.
     
    The push by the Mayor and Council of Kirkland Lake for the building of an incinerator is a significant media story for Temiskaming. The region of Temiskarning is not having a say, yet the region will be markedly impacted by this incinerator.
     
    M. McSherry
    Kirkland Lake
     
     
    Not a Safe way to go
    Dear Editor:
     
    It was near freezing on January 5 2002 in Kirkland Lake.
     
    Fortunately it was overcast or the sun would have melted the ice along the boards. The hockey game between Bennett and those who are opposing the incineration of PCB's was well played. I did not see any high sticks or elbows in the corners. There was ample amount of respect shown by all who were present. I would estimate that there were 200 people in attendance, with at least 90 per cent of those opposed to the Bennett proposal. I am disappointed that more people who are in favour of this old technology of incineration did not come to this community gathering.
     
    What I heard was that the PCB's in our environment need to be cleaned up, but I think this old outdated technology of incineration is not a safe way to go about it.
     
    Bob Wolfe
    Hudson Twp.
     
    5) Northern Daily News - 1/30/02 - Editorial Page
    Letter to the Editor
     
    Will current legislation protect residents?
    To the editor:
     
    Quite some time ago, I made a decision not to involve myself in any type of politics in this Riding. The Adams Mine proposal and now the Bennett proposal has caused me to want to voice my opinion.
     
    I have avoided attending meetings which I should have attended. I know very little about Bennett's proposed plant. I would like to have an open mind to this proposal until I understand the facts but that is impossible. I am not a chemist, scientist, etc. thus the terminology is beyond me.
     
    For this reason I have a tendency to oppose Bennett's proposal because I have such great fear of the unknown. I am sure that if this same plant was to be placed in any other area of the province there would be opposition.
     
    I would like to comment on MPP David Ramsay's stand or "non stand" on this issue. Mr. Ramsay has been in politics since 1985 and at one time was the Minister of Agriculture. He also came from a farming community. He should know the repercussions or the positives of such a plant as Bennett Environmental. He stated that "Bennett could be shut down if something went wrong". He further stated, "You can shut off the process at any time if it appears to be dangerous."
     
    I then turned the page and read Mr. Ramsay's article from Queen's Park. He criticizes the government with the following statement "...people died because the Tories turned their backs on public safety."
     
    Tell me Mr. Ramsay, do you trust the Tory government to shut down the Bennett plant in time to save the people subjected to the dangerous chemicals?
     
    Let's face it - you are playing politics again. As a representative of this Riding, you have a responsibility to the people to know the pros and cons of such a plant.
     
    You should have had the facts by now so you could take a stand!
     
    What the people really need to know immediately is if the present legislation addresses the potential damages that could come from the process being proposed. We know the government let the people of Walkerton down. Why should we trust them now?
     
    Has Mr. Ramsay even investigated the legislation in this particular situation and if so, why can't he take a stand based on the legislation? Further, Mr. Ramsay should feel obligated to advise his constituents whether or not the legislation meets a high enough standard to protect the people of this Riding. We must bear in mind that once something is contaminated, the process needs to be reversed and that is where the regulations /legislation comes in. What man puts together, man should be able to take apart.
     
    Jean Rivard
    Kirkland Lake
     
    ______________________________________________
    6) Northern Daily News - 1/31/02 - Page 3
    Ramsay looks into Bennett
     
    JIM PATRICK
    Northern Daily News
     
    Kirkland Lake:
     
    Following a meeting with Bennett Environmental Inc., Timiskaming Cochrane MPP David Ramsay said he is asking the company to do a base line study to determine the current level of toxicity in area air, water, soil, agricultural products and human tissue.
     
    In an interview, Ramsay said his meeting Wednesday with Bennett "was excellent".
     
    "I got assurances about continuous monitoring to be done by the company," the MPP said.
     
    Bennett Chief Operating Officer Danny Ponn could not be reached before press time today.
     
    "It is important we consider the potential impact of the Bennett proposal, so we have complete knowledge of the present health of our environment," the MPP said.
     
    Ramsay noted the importance of the company communicating about its operations.
     
    "We discussed the three things of interest to me continuous monitoring, the base-line study and standards. The standards have yet to be imposed and this will be done by the Ministry of the Environment," he said.
     
    "That's why it is too early for me to say I'm for or against" this project, he said.
     
    Ramsay added that he wanted to see the outcome of the studies and enforcement levels imposed by the MOE.
     
    "I did learn if the company exceeds limits imposed by the MOE, then the environment ministry treats it like a liquid spill, except in this case, it is an air spill.
     
    "The MOE is supposed to react to that and it's those safeguards I want there."
     
    Remarking on the standards the company must adhere to, Ramsay said these are changing this year across the country.
     
    Concerning the base-line study; the MPP commented this is a concern of New Liskeard and Haileybury municipal councils and the company is being called upon to expedite this process.
     
    "They're going to have to do it anyway for the certificate of approval application, so why not do it concurrently?"
     
    Ramsay said Bennett hasn't agreed to do this yet. "They didn't know I was going to ask for this at Wednesday's meeting. But why not do it now? They're going to have to take samples in all four seasons."
     
    Just where that sampling would be done would be left to the ministry.
     
    "The study would only go as far as the scientists believe the plume would have any effect on the environment and that's why the MOE would have to approve the methodology. But I've also asked for public input on this."
     
    The base-line study would record what impurities may already be in the environment and whether or not Bennett was adding more to it.
     
    ______________________________________________
     
    PCB Digest
    http://www.nt.net/~savard/toxic/
     
    PCB Information
    http://www21.brinkster.com/nopcb/