INDEX PCB Digest - 2/18/02
    ______________________________________________
    1) PCT - Press Release - February 17, 2002
    PCB Battle Spills Over Into Quebec
    2) The Toronto Star - Sunday, February 17, 2002 - 
    Section B, Page 1
    Monsanto's PCB scandal
     
    ______________________________________________
    1) PCT - Press Release - February 17, 2002
    PCB Battle Spills Over Into Quebec
     
    Thornloe Over 60 people from Northeastern 
    Ontario and Northwestern Quebec attended an organizing meeting in 
    Temiskaming this afternoon to form a joint coalition against a 
    proposed international PCB waste incinerator.
     
    The meeting, held in the farming village of Thornloe, 
    was the first official meeting between Quebec and Ontario activists 
    in the effort to stop the Bennett incinerator from going ahead. If 
    approved, the incinerator would be the largest of its kind in Canada. 
    The company is looking to use the site to burn contaminated materials 
    from the U.S. and Mexico. .
     
    David Martineau and Lise Chartrand, who are members of 
    Union Paysanne, a Quebec agricultural organization, told the crowd 
    that their organization would turn the Bennett fight into a national issue.
     
    We will be organizing through our villages,
     Ms. Chartrand told the crowd. We will work with national 
    organizations. We will not let you down. We will fight this to the end.
     
    Union Paysanne told the crowd it has been meeting with 
    Quebec politicians and provincial organizations to organize against 
    the cross-border threat of potential PCB and dioxin contamination. 
    The region, on both sides of the Ontario/Quebec border, is heavily 
    dependent on a $100 million a year agricultural industry. The threat 
    posed by dioxin to agriculture is well established. In 1999, a mere 
    50 milligrams of dioxin contamination caused billions of dollars 
    worth of damage to the Belgian farming industry.
     
    Charlie Angus, speaking for Public Concern 
    Temiskaming, told the crowd the dioxin threat was worse than they imagined.
     
    Bennett Environmental has told residents of 
    Northern Ontario not to worry about dioxins, said Angus. 
    And yet they are telling U.S. investors that they are actively 
    seeking out dioxin-contaminated sites. The people of this region have 
    a right to know that we are being set up as a dumping ground to burn 
    dioxin-contaminated materials from the U.S.
     
    Both the Quebec and Northern Ontario organizations 
    left the meeting with the pledge to work closely with each other and 
    with First Nations to beat the Bennett proposal
     
    For more information:
    Charlie Angus (705) 679-5533  /  (705) 648-5784
    David Martineau (819) 761-2177
     
    ______________________________________________
    2) The Toronto Star - Sunday, February 17, 2002 - 
    Section B, Page 1
    Monsanto's PCB scandal
    Dirt-poor residents seek compensation in Alabama town 
    that was secretly poisoned for decades
     
    William Walker
     
    WASHINGTON BUREAU
     
    ANNISTON, Ala. HER ARMS ARE folded tightly, hands 
    clenched beneath her armpits, as she peers warily through the screen 
    door at the stranger talking to her son.
     
    Johnny Hanvey has just wrenched his head out from 
    under the gas pedal of the pickup truck he's trying to fix on the 
    front lawn of the family's sagging clapboard bungalow.
     
    Across the street, white plumes of smoke billow from 
    the old Monsanto factory, now part of the giant biotechnology 
    conglomerate's Solutia Inc. pharmaceutical division, behind a 
    barbed-wire fence ominously marked, "Danger."
     
    Finally, Jura Hanvey, frail at 79, toddles out 
    gingerly, wrapped in a red bathrobe, her hair finally grown back 
    after chemotherapy.
     
    "Are you here about Monsanto?" she asks, her 
    eyes suddenly alight. "I hope someone does something about that Monsanto.
     
    "I lost a breast to cancer, I've had open-heart 
    surgery and now I have acute asthma. They don't do anything to help 
    me. Now, I've got to go see three different doctors."
     
    Johnny Hanvey knows how lucky his mother is to be 
    alive, given the almost unbelievable circumstances of Monsanto's 
    decades-long role in secretly turning this would-be-picturesque rural 
    Alabama town into one of the worst environmental disasters in America.
     
    Anniston (pop. 45,000) sits among rolling hills in 
    eastern Alabama, almost halfway between Birmingham and Atlanta. It 
    seems quaintly frozen in time. "Cowboys" is the popular gas 
    station, "Good Hearted Bob's" is the car dealership and 
    eateries boast of "genuine BBQ."
     
    From 1935 to 1972, Monsanto manufactured 
    polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at its Anniston plant.
     
    Documents show that Monsanto knew as early as the 
    1950s that PCBs were a toxic danger, but that the company skilfully 
    hid that evidence from residents, all the while dumping PCB waste 
     sometimes more than 110 kilograms of it a day  into two 
    huge unlined landfill sites near the Hanveys' neighbourhood.
     
    The company stopped making PCBs, once widely used as 
    industrial coolants and electrical insulators, only because it knew 
    Washington was going to ban their manufacture because of safety 
    concerns, as the government finally did in 1979.
     
    For years now, Monsanto's landfills have leached PCBs, 
    lead and mercury into Anniston's streams and soil. One of the 
    landfills is on a hillside, gravity helping the factory's 
    contaminants to drain toward the area's modest homes whenever it rains.
     
    Anniston's rising cancer rate, although never studied 
    scientifically, is often measured by the growing number of tombstones 
    and abandoned houses.
     
    The story could be a sequel to the Academy 
    Award-winning movie Erin Brockovich, except it's missing the 
    people's-advocate title character.
     
    Instead, small groups of town residents are getting 
    together to seek compensation on a piecemeal basis through the 
    courts, while little is being done to effect a comprehensive cleanup 
    of Anniston's toxic swamp.
     
    The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
    joined the fray just three years ago, at the urging of local 
    residents. It took more than 2,500 water and soil samples from 800 
    locations in west Anniston and lab results showed there were 
    "elevated levels of PCBs, lead and other hazardous substances."
     
    In many cases, the PCB levels were hundreds of times 
    higher than the federal limit.
     
    The EPA concluded that its tests, along with those 
    conducted by Alabama agencies, "have determined that the PCB 
    contamination is attributable to the operations of the former 
    Monsanto plant."
     
    Scientists confirm that PCBs can cause cancer, 
    neurological disorders, reproductive problems, immune-system 
    depression, developmental problems in children, liver damage and skin irritation.
     
    Critics of the genetically modified food industry see 
    the Anniston story as a cautionary tale, since Monsanto is one of the 
    multinational corporations now asking the world to accept its word 
    that GM food crops are safe.
     
    In Anniston, records show, Monsanto had some crucial 
    information about food safety but hid it.
     
    "I've done my talking," says Ruth Mims, 
    opening the door of her frame house on McDanial St., one of the most 
    contaminated streets in one of America's most contaminated towns. 
    "Y'all are welcome to come in, but it's time for someone else to talk."
     
    After Mims testified at a jury trial last spring on 
    behalf of a group of 1,600 plaintiffs, Monsanto's lawyers had heard 
    enough. Rather than leave compensation in the hands of the jury, they 
    sought a recess and immediately settled out of court.
     
    Back in 1970, the jury was told, Monsanto suddenly 
    wanted to purchase Mims' hogs, which sometimes strayed from her 
    backyard on to company property.
     
    What Mims didn't know then was that her hogs had 
    tested 90,000 times the legal limit for PCBs. No one ever told her.
     
    "I used to eat them hogs!" Mims told the court.
     
    Many of her neighbours in this dirt-poor community 
    also fished for dinner from the area's two creeks, which were 
    horribly contaminated with PCBs, lead and mercury.
     
    Monsanto had known this since 1966, when a scientist 
    hired by the company dropped 25 perfectly healthy fish into Snow 
    Creek and observed their behaviour.
     
    Within 10 seconds, none of the fish could swim and in 
    less than four minutes they were all dead, many having shed their skins.
     
    In Anniston's larger Choccolocco Creek, one fish, a 
    blacktail shiner, was found to have 37,800 parts per million of PCBs, 
    when the legal limit was 5 parts per million.
     
    Even worse, while Monsanto hid what it knew for 
    decades, Anniston residents believed the rich, red-clay soil of their 
    hometown contained nutrients. They would form the clay into patties, 
    bake them and eat them.
     
    "I think most everyone in that neighbourhood ate 
    clay dirt. Once you'd start eating it, you came to crave it," 
    Mims testified in that first jury trial.
     
    And almost everyone in west Anniston spent the long, 
    hot summer months growing tomatoes, vegetables and greens in their 
    backyards, hundreds of which are now known to have highly dangerous 
    levels of PCBs and lead.
     
    Last spring, Mims and her fellow plaintiffs settled 
    for about $40 million (U.S.)  a pittance, considering the 
    billions it would cost the company to clean up its damage to Anniston.
     
    After lawyers' fees, the settlement meant about 
    $18,000 for Mims, less than the amount her now-unsaleable house has 
    devalued. And no amount of money could help ease the memory of two 
    sisters dead from cancer, a third sister who lost both breasts to 
    cancer and six of her 13 siblings who died during their childhoods.
     
    In the modern courthouse 30 minutes up the highway in 
    Gadsen, another 3,500 plaintiffs are now in court with Monsanto in a 
    new attempt for compensation.
     
    Monsanto may have settled with Mims' group, but with 
    this new case in court and another 15,000 plaintiffs having filed 
    suit in a case to be heard next year, the company is fighting against 
    having to pay millions more in damages.
     
    In Gadsen, the eight women and seven men of the jury 
    listen to harrowing testimony from plaintiffs.
     
    When her doctor informed her that her blood was rife 
    with PCBs, 81-year-old Annie Bea Brown told the court, it "made 
    me think what in the world happened to me with all this stuff going 
    around in my body."
     
    Testified 70-year-old Hassie Taylor: "We do not 
    know what it will do to us. I worry about my life savings. Sometimes, 
    I wake up at 3 o'clock in the morning and just lay there."
     
    A woman slumped on a mahogany bench in the court's 
    visitors' gallery, a plaintiff who can't be identified here because 
    she was speaking outside the courtroom, said she'd just been to 
    hospital for a biopsy because her doctor suspects she has cancer.
     
    Monsanto lawyer Jere White told the jury that, 
    regarding these 3,500 plaintiffs, the company sees "no reason 
    for them to worry about getting sick."
     
    Donald Stewart, lawyer for the plaintiffs, told the 
    jury it's clear Monsanto knew for decades about the problem it was 
    causing  Harvard scientists linked PCBs to health hazards in 
    the late 1930s  but did virtually nothing. Instead, he said, 
    the company put "profits before safety."
     
    White countered that Monsanto had taken 
    "responsible action" and that there'd been "no harm done."
     
    To take the Erin Brockovich analogy one step further, 
    White accused the plaintiffs' lawyer of giving a "movie 
    version" of what took place in Anniston over the years.
     
    But Stewart had just begun.
     
    He told of a hog found dead by Monsanto decades ago 
    atop the hillside landfill dump and of company tests that showed the 
    animal was off-the-charts high for PCB levels.
     
    The hog's owner, now one of the plaintiffs in the 
    Gadsen case, has sworn a statement that someone from Monsanto came to 
    his house and offered him a bottle of whisky and $25 a head for his 
    remaining hogs, which the company allegedly killed and buried without 
    telling anyone about the test results.
     
    In fact, a closer look at Monsanto's own documents 
    tells the story of a company that tried at every turn to minimize the 
    release of public information on pollution dangers it knew about at 
    its Anniston plant.
     
    They also show that Monsanto took shortcuts on 
    abatement measures and that company officials vowed not to lose 
    "one dollar" of profits.
     
    Last month, Monsanto's St. Louis-based president, 
    Hendrik Verfaillie, told Associated Press that the company he leads 
    has nothing to do with the past.
     
    "We want to be seen as a new company with new 
    management and new behaviour and we want to be disassociated as much 
    as possible with whatever happened in the past and the 
    chemicals," he said. "That's not where we are focused. 
    That's not what we are trying to accomplish."
     
    Verfaillie said his company is more open these days 
    and has established a "Monsanto Pledge" committing it to 
    dialogue and transparency.
     
    "Before, we would do all these studies and we 
    would keep them in a vault and we would not communicate anything 
    about it," he said.
     
    Indeed. The Washington-based Environmental Working 
    Group has released 4,000 pages of internal Monsanto documents, many 
    of them marked, "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL." The pages were 
    obtained through trial exhibits, court pleadings and legal discovery 
    documents. They tell a stunning story.
     
    One 1975 memo from a company employee to his superior 
    stated: "We have no information relating to the effects of PCBs 
    on the people in the areas surrounding our producing facility. We 
    have no programs underway at present to study these effects."
     
    There's no doubt that Monsanto knew all about PCBs and 
    their risks. A 1971 memo between company executives stated: "I 
    can say that we have probably the world's best reference file on the 
    PCB situation. This includes reprints from the literature beginning 
    in 1936 to reports issued last week."
     
    As early as 1951, Monsanto officials knew Aroclors, 
    the brand name for the company's PCBs, were not safe.
     
    "As I am sure you know, Aroclors cannot be 
    considered non-toxic," one company official wrote in a memo.
     
    By 1955, Monsanto had decided to try to protect its 
    workers, but not its Anniston neighbours.
     
    "It is the opinion of the medical 
    department," a 1955 memo stated, "that the eating of 
    lunches should not be allowed in this department. Early literature 
    work claimed that chlorinated biphenyls were quite toxic. ... In any 
    case where a workman claimed physical harm from any contaminated 
    food, it would be extremely difficult on the basis of past literature 
    reports to counter such claims."
     
    A 1958 memo showed the company's position on mandatory 
    labelling: The company would "comply with the minimum and not 
    give any unnecessary information which could very well damage our 
    sales position."
     
    Six years later, responding to new labelling 
    requirements, a memo urged a "very minimum precautionary statement."
     
    By 1970, Monsanto was bunkered down, trying to fight 
    off growing fears about PCBs and protect its profits of $22 million 
    (U.S.) in worldwide sales.
     
    "We can't afford to lose one dollar of 
    business," a 1970 company memo stated. "Our attitude in 
    discussing this subject with our customers will be the deciding 
    factor in our success or failure in retaining all our present business."
     
    A memo sent in 1976, four years after Monsanto ceased 
    producing PCBs and was worried about legal liability, shows the 
    company had turned to a strategy of denial. "Avoid any comments 
    that suggest liability; avoid any medical questions if possible; do 
    not offer information," the memo states. "If a question 
    comes up, say our development work was shelved."
     
    Unlike the $500 million PCB-dredging operation that 
    the EPA ordered General Electric to provide for New York's Hudson 
    River  or even the true story of California's Pacific Gas and 
    Electric, on which the Brockovich movie was based  Monsanto 
    likely has evaded a large-scale cleanup order. And that's due, at 
    least in part, to Alabama's lax attitude on environmental matters.
     
    In the last decade, while state environmental 
    agencies' budgets across the U.S. increased by an average of 140 per 
    cent, Alabama's environmental budget was cut back.
     
    Meanwhile, city officials in Anniston have long 
    favoured a pro-business attitude in order to create much-needed jobs. 
    Even today, they continue to play down the area's toxic problems.
     
    "To me, the real story here is that Alabama has 
    such weak environmental laws and they've always sacrificed them for 
    job creation," says west Anniston resident Keith Howland, a 
    Chicago native who came here 14 years ago with his Alabama bride.
     
    "The local chamber of commerce and local 
    government have done a very good job of minimizing this because it's 
    bad for business. ... It's the `good old boys' syndrome that has 
    become so obvious to me living here since 1988.
     
    "These guys just keep covering each other's butts 
    all the time. It's dirty government and bad business. We're 70 years 
    behind the times in terms of government and environmental policy."
     
    Cheryl Smith just looks sad about it all as she stands 
    outside her mother's house, two doors down from Mims' on McDanial St. 
    and next to one of many abandoned, ransacked houses that have become 
    garbage dumps of tin cans and animal feces.
     
    Smith agrees that the money her mother, and Mims, 
    accepted in last spring's settlement seemed like a lot at the time.
     
    But now, she says, "I'm not satisfied at all. 
    Personally, I think Monsanto pulled a fast one on us. There was a lot 
    of double-talk done.
     
    "Myself, I'm not familiar with how the legal 
    system works, but I think we could have gotten compensated more than 
    we did. Especially as seeing that we know more information now as far 
    as contamination goes."
     
    Smith's family has a history of asthma, cancer, 
    arthritis, kidney and liver disease.
     
    "I think personally there was a lot of stuff that 
    we weren't aware of," she says. "I feel we were shortchanged."
     
    At the Kelley-Steadman American Legion hall, Post 312, 
    in west Anniston, one of the few enterprises still operating in the 
    neighbourhood, Harold and two of his buddies are sitting at the bar, 
    sipping on half-pint bottles of Jack Daniels bourbon and cans of malt liquor.
     
    Harold, whose parents both died of cancer, has lived 
    in west Anniston his entire life, except for his stint in the U.S. 
    Marines, when he spent eight months fighting in Vietnam.
     
    He doesn't want his last name used because he's 
    working with a lawyer on a future group lawsuit against Monsanto.
     
    "Sometimes," Harold says, staring blankly 
    into his drink, "I think nothing has happened to solve all of 
    this, because what you have here is a poor black neighbourhood.
     
    "You could call it politics. If this keeps 
    dragging on, most of the people in this neighbourhood will be dead 
    before anything happens to clean this mess up."
     
    ______________________________________________
     
    PCB Digest
    http://www.nt.net/~savard/toxic/
     
    PCB Information
    http://www21.brinkster.com/nopcb/