INDEX PCB Digest - 6/4/02
______________________________________________
1) Public Concern Temiskaming - MEDIA ADVISORY - 6/4/02
Release of Accident Reports Raises Questions About Bennett Incinerator
2) Northern Ontario Business (monthly newspaper) - 6/02
Toxic Wars
Kirkland Lake is determined to carve out its own niche, despite  backlash over a proposed incinerator project.

______________________________________________
1) Public Concern Temiskaming - MEDIA ADVISORY - 6/4/02
Release of Accident Reports Raises Questions About Bennett Incinerator

Opponents of the proposed Bennett incinerator are accusing the Tories’ streamlined EA process of compromising public health.

Bennett Environmental is currently undergoing a streamlined EA for what will be the largest hazardous waste incinerator of its kind in Canada. The incinerator is scheduled to be built near two grade schools and a day care in a residential neighbourhood in Kirkland Lake despite the fact that the plan contravenes national CCME guidelines.

At a press conference being held on Wednesday morning, Public Concern Temiskaming will release accident reports from Bennett’s existing incinerator in Quebec. The documents detail safety problems and upsets at the Quebec incinerator. The release of these documents raise serious doubts about the reliability of Ontario’s streamlined EA process which is dependent on the claims of company-paid consultants.

The reports are being released as a number of northern municipalities openly express doubt about Ontario’s EA process.

NDP Environment Critic Marilyn Churley will speak on the need to press the MOE for accountability in protecting the safety of Ontario citizens.

Press Conference at Queen’s Park
Media Studio
Legislative Building
Time: 11:00 AM
Wednesday, June 5, 2002

Marilyn Churley (NDP Environment Critic)
Terry Graves (Public Concern Temiskaming)

-30-

_____________________________________________
2) Northern Ontario Business newspaper - 6/02

Toxic Wars
Kirkland Lake is determined to carve out its own niche, despite  backlash over a proposed incinerator project.

By Ian Ross

KIRKLAND LAKE — The empty storefronts and “Going out of business” sale signs on the twisting downtown streets of this mining town of 14,000 reflect the dilemma many one-industry communities find themselves in.

Reliant for generations on the natural resources industry’s cyclical nature for its livelihood, the town with the “mile of gold” is a shadow of its former self.

The spring reopening of the Macassa Mine by Foxpoint Resources is a feel-good boost to the town’s morale, but many locals realize it will never match the glory days of the 1950s and ‘60s when more than a half-dozen mines operated along Kirkland Lake’s main drag.

Today’s grim reality shows Kirkland Lake experiencing the country’s fourth-highest population drop among municipalities of more than 5,000 according to Census Canada, with a 12.4 per cent decline since 1996.

Rather than be enslaved a boom-and-bust economy, determined local leaders are carving out their own niche by promoting the town as a centre for environmental industry solutions.

However, the town’s diversification strategy has raised the hackles of environmental activists in the Timiskaming district who battled Temagami logging, the Adams Mine landfill and now the town’s proposed hazardous waste incinerator by Bennett Environmental Inc.

The “No Toronto garbage” signs on hay wagons and front lawns have been replaced by “No toxic waste” billboards on rock cuts and farm fields along Highway 11.

“Kirkland Lake views the environmental sector as a huge growth industry globally,” says Todd Morgan, a town councillor who heads the municipality’s economic development committee and serves on Bennett’s citizens’ liaison committee.

“We realized during the Adams Mine process, the populace here has an open mind and that has helped us go down this road,” says Morgan, which grants them an “edge” over other northern communities stuck in a “NIMBY-ism mindset.”

Bennett Environmental owns and operates a two-stage incineration facility in St. Ambroise, Que. that cleans contaminated soil at extremely high temperatures, about 1000 Degrees C. Using the same thermal oxidizer system planned for Kirkland Lake, Bennett is seeking an operating licence and is in the midst of a three-year environmental assessment by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE).

The 110,000-square-foot plant earmarked for a 45-acre lot in Kirkland Lake’s environmental industrial park on Archer Drive would create 35 jobs and process 200,000 tonnes of contaminated soil waste annually.

If their permitting application is successful, the plant could open as early as late 2003.

But in promoting their vision of environmental solutions, Kirkland Lake has set itself up as a lightning rod for environmental activists.

“So be it,” says Morgan. “I mean who are the true environmentalists? Who’s out there trying to clean up the world?

“We live here. We’re not going to dirty our backyard. It’s ridiculous.”

Opponents answer not only are they dirtying their own backyard but everyone else’s for hundreds of kilometres around if leaks from the plant release PCBs, dioxins and furans into the air and water.

They fear the burning of contaminated waste and the residue produced is much worse than the waste itself.

It is a desperate attempt by Kirkland Lake to create a paltry number of jobs and rake in big bucks at any cost, explains Terry Graves of Public Concern Timiskaming,

“This is what Northern Ontario has become; a place to get rid of your crap.”

Having little faith in the MOE’s “Harris-ized” environmental review process, Graves believes Ontario’s watered-down regulations only serve to foster new business opportunities in economically depressed areas.

“Toxic waste gravitates to the constituency with the lowest standards, so welcome to Northern Ontario.”

Aligned with him are First Nations leaders and farmers in the Timiskaming district, Tri-Town area businesses and a group of 34 area doctors who released a petition the accidental release of toxins from the proposed Bennett plant could be harmful to fetuses, babies and children in homes and schools within a 1.5-kilometre radius of the plant site.

Though Graves calls the burning of contaminants an “18th-century technology,” Kirkland Lake town officials refer to the process as a safe alternative to contaminated soil ending up in a landfill somewhere.

Morgan insists “there’s no free ride” for environmental companies eyeing Kirkland Lake.

“As long as these companies pass the environmental process, we’re very comfortable with them.”

The town has already been successful in attracting Trans-Cycle Industries, an American company specializing in recycling contaminated soils, sludge and debris.

Bennett’s plan is to truck soil, gravel, rock, old building site material from contaminated sites across Canada and the U.S.

But only PCB-contaminated waste from Canada is being accepted, says Danny Ponn, Bennett’s chief operating officer. He forecasts huge company growth with the legislative movement toward cleaning up the estimated 3 to 5 million tonnes of contaminated soil just in Ontario brownfield sites alone.

“If we need to clean up in 20 years, the Kirkland Lake facility is not enough.”

Though Ponn admits there have been documented air-emission leaks caused by power outages at its St. Ambroise plant, Bennett vows to do better, spending $3 million on consultants and embracing public input to build in every possible precaution for Kirkland Lake.

“Everything has a risk. We are a heavy industrial facility,” but the “incremental risks” should be negligible for those living near the plant.

“If a family of four lived at the maximum point of emission for 70 years, ate food from their backyard garden, drank local water and ate area fish, the risk is less than one in one million of contracting cancer and other health impacts,” which falls within the MOE’s risk assessment guidelines, says Ponn.

Despite the stigma in attracting these industries, “people are calling us,” says Morley Bowes, the town’s chief administrative officer, adding that the town is engaged in talks ranging from “exploratory” to “serious” with at least 10 other environmental companies attracted to its the town’s spacious and cheap industrial property and its sewer-water-power system designed for 20,000 people.

“Kirkland Lake just has its own self-serving agenda and they’ve shown they don’t give a damn about anybody outside of their own business community,” says Graves.

His group will continue compiling a dossier on Bennett and their practices, crashing the company shareholder meetings and inviting scientific and ex-industry experts to public rallies in communities along the Highway 11 corridor.

Though not willing to divulge the specifics of the next stage of their campaign, Graves, a litigation manager at a New Liskeard law firm, says their intent is simply to educate and raise awareness of the risks associated with incineration.

Graves says the past decade’s controversies have split families, ruined friendships and occasionally veered into threats of violence.  Morgan rolls his eyes and accuses Graves’ group of “driving a wedge” between communities.

Gauging the level of support and size of the opposition on each side of the fence depends upon who one talks to. Even the last municipal election in Kirkland Lake, fought referendum-style, resulting in a clear-cut victory for the pro-Adams Mine and pro-Bennett supporters, is open to interpretation as to what candidate supported what issues.

But there is no doubt the polarized attitudes are set in concrete. In sampling some street opinions on a downtown Kirkland Lake street, a half-dozen citizens waved off interview requests.

One small businessman expressed satisfaction with the answers provided by Bennett officials during a series of public information meetings. Though not overjoyed with the unwanted attention the town has received, the benefits for the community “far outweigh” any negatives, he says.

“We’re looking forward to Bennett coming in, we can sure use the employment.

“As far as the controversy is concerned, it seems to come from a small group of people who oppose anything that comes this way.

He declined to give his name though.

_____________________________________________
 

PCB Digest
http://members.fortunecity.com/toxic/

PCB Information
http://www21.brinkster.com/nopcb/