Pulling the Garbage Goalie The KL  Press and 
    the Last Days
    of the Adams Mine by Charlie Angus HighGrader Magazine
    January 2002
     
    It may have been showboating. Or it could have been the
    final descent into garbage madness. On the eve of Toronto
    Council¹s vote to ratify the contract with 
    Republic Waste of
    Michigan, Kirkland Lake Council announced it was going to
    play ³hardball² with Toronto to get the 
    Adams Mine proposal
    revived.
       
    KL¹s tough talk made big splashes in the local 
    media but
    wasn¹t even noticed down in TO. Like the 
    ignomious Black
    Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail, KL editorial
    scribes found themselves flaying hopelessly at an opponent
    that had long since walked away from the field.
    Partly as a journalistic obligation and, partly 
    because it¹s
    just too funny to pass up, HighGrader presents you 
    with the
    last bizarre and bitter days of the Adams family......
     
    From reading the Northern Daily News, you would have thought
    Canada¹s largest city was shaking in its boots. Kirkland
    Lake Mayor Bill Enouy had thrown down the gauntlet and it
    was time Toronto listened up. At the November 20th council
    meeting in Kirkland Lake, Enouy informed KL 
    councillors that
    he was giving the City two weeks to get serious about
    negotiating another Adams Mine deal, or he was going 
    to pull
    his ³proposal² off the table.
       
    The proposal, first floated in August (see Plan 9 from
    Kirkland Lake, HighGrader September 2001), had already been
    completely rejected by Toronto Works Committee. 
    Critics had
    dismissed the ³Enviroganics 2010² proposal 
    as a
    regurgitation of the old Adams Mine plan and the city was
    adamant it would never go back to the Adams Mine.
       
    But on the editorial pages of the Northern Daily News,
    Enouy¹s ultimatum stood out as an act of Churchillian
    resolve. In an editorial entitled ³It¹s Our 
    Time to Play
    Hardball² the scribes intoned that ³Enouy 
    has finally come
    to the conclusion that there¹s no sense playing 
    Mr. Nice Guy
    with politicians in Toronto.²     
    It¹s not the first time
    Enouy has swung wildly at the big boys. In 1998, while still
    a councillor, he denounced the National Post over an article
    which described KL as the ³garbage capital of Canada².
       
    National Post -- my ass,² said Enouy during a Council
    meeting where he got so heated he had to step outside to
    cool down. Enouy denounced the article as typical of the
    ³left wing, pinko press.² The Northern Daily 
    News, however,
    misquoted Enouy¹s attack as a denunciation of the ³left
    wing, pickle press.
       
    Pickle or pinko, when Enouy led the November attack on
    Toronto, the Northern Daily News was fully onside. 
    They made
    the two week ultimatum resound like the righteous 
    crack of
    Sheriff Buford Pusser¹s baseball bat in the 
    70¹s b-movie
    ³Walking Tall.²     ³This
     time, Enouy isn¹t going to let
    Toronto play politics. He¹s told them to take it 
    or leave
    it. It¹s a bold approach.²    
     What the paper didn¹t point
    out is that the two week ultimatum coincided with Toronto¹s
    upcoming vote to finally ratify its deal with Republic Waste
    of Michigan. Once the vote was passed, there 
    wouldn¹t be a
    deal to make anyway.
       
    The paper also overlooked another glaring problem with
    the Enouy ultimatum  in order to threaten an 
    opponent, you
    have to first get their attention. And nobody at Toronto
    Council seemed remotely aware that Kirkland Lake 
    Council was
    demanding an 11th hour seat at the garbage negotiating
    table.
       
    HighGrader spoke with two Toronto Councillors who sit on
    the Works Committee. Neither were aware of the impending
    ultimatum. Said one, ³I don¹t understand 
    what proposal
    they¹re threatening to take off the table. As far 
    as I know
    there hasn¹t been a deal with Kirkland Lake since 
    Rail Cycle
    North refused to meet the terms of the contract last
    October.²
     
    To any outside observer, the High Noon talk emanating from
    the Northern Daily News may have seemed delusional. 
    For one,
    the City was on the verge of voting on the Republic contract
     a vote that was seen by all City Hall watchers 
    as a mere
    rubber stamp to a deal which had been in the works for over
    a year.
       
    And secondly, the very mention of the Adams Mine made
    Toronto politicians and media wince. The planned use 
    of the
    water-logged pits as a dump had resulted in the most
    humiliating municipal defeat in City history.
    Support for the Adams Mine had destroyed the political
    career of TO powerhouse Bill Saundercook and sent other
    councillors scurrying for electoral cover.
       
    Even the normally bubbly Mayor Mel Lastman had seen his
    reputation shredded during the fractious dump debate. Before
    Adams Mine, Lastman was the mayor who could do no wrong.
    After Adams Mine, he¹d become the guy who 
    couldn¹t do right.
       
    And yet, editorial writers in KL ignored the city¹s
    clear opposition to the dump. They dismissed 
    Toronto¹s new
    plan, which included a major recycling effort, as simply
    more ³worming around.²
     
    Opponents of the Adams Mine have long accused the
    Kirkland Lake media of blindly championing the Adams Mine.
       
    Pierre Belanger, spokesman for the Against the Adams
    Mine Coalition, speaking at an anti-dump rally on December
    2nd, noted the fact that nobody from the Kirkland Lake media
    was in attendance to cover the rally. It was the 
    second such
    rally in as many months which suffered the silent treatment
    from the KL press (both events, however, were considered
    newsworthy enough to be covered by outside media).
       
    But if the KL media wasn¹t telling locals that the
    Emperor¹s new dump proposal lacked clothes, 
    neither was
    Mayor Enouy. Having had doors slammed in his face since
    January he should have easily been able to gauge the 
    lack of
    response his ultimatum would receive in Toronto.
       
    The open hostility in Toronto for Adams Mine and its
    backers was made abundantly clear at the November 
    meeting of
    Toronto Works. Enouy and McGuinty had attended this meeting
    in the hopes of getting one more kick at the Adams 
    Mine can.
    Acting Works Chair, Jane Pitfield, however, made sure the
    ³buzz off² message was made as black and 
    white as the
    stripes on the Mayor¹s favourite bowling shirt.
       
     ³They told me I couldn¹t mention Adams 
    Mine, Kirkland
    Lake, Ontario,² Enouy later complained. 
    ³Every time I went
    to open my mouth the lady (Chairman Pitfield) said 
    don¹t go
    there, don¹t say that, don¹t do that.¹ 
    It was completely
    rude and unacceptable. That democracy won¹t 
    listen to the
    people.²    
     
    The November Works meeting may have been an
    embarrassing rout for the proud Mayor, but the Northern
    Daily News put a wild spin on the Enouy defeat. 
    ³Living in a
    Dream World²  blared a full-barrelled front 
    page headline.
    According to the article, it wasn¹t Enouy, 
    McGuinty or the
    Northern Daily News staff that were living in the dream
    world  but Councillor Pitfield for refusing to 
    buy another
    Adams Mine pitch.
     
     
    Waiting for Harris        
     
    With days ticking down to the Toronto vote, the 
    Northern Daily News began to turn up the rhetoric. Toronto 
    Councillors were now depicted as having ignored the voice of the 
    ³people² and Premier Mike Harris
    was needed to teach a lesson to those nasty TO councillors.
    According to one editorial,³Toronto Council is 
    once again
    mistreating the people of Kirkland Lake and it¹s time
    Premier Mike Harris stepped in and did something.²
         The
    prospect of Harris intervening and overturning a city vote
    in order to help revive a contract for a North Bay company
    might have seemed  to most a staggering 
    undermining of the
    democratic process. The Northern Daily News, however, saw
    this intervention as the salvation of democracy. 
    ³It¹s time
    democracy was restored at Toronto City Council....Mr.
    Harris, we¹re waiting.²    
     
    KL¹s call for Big Mike was being echoed on a more serious
    level in the Premier¹s hometown of North Bay. 
    Gordon McGuinty, realizing that he was just days from economic 
    oblivion, began
    to publicly push the Premier to derail the vote.
       
    At a press conference held on November 21st in North
    Bay, Gordon McGuinty stood in front of a banner that
    proclaimed: ³Premier Harris: do what you said you 
    would do².
    McGuinty wanted Harris to order an EA of the Michigan plan,
    thereby throwing Toronto¹s garbage plans once 
    more into
    chaos.
       
    The public challenge to the now lame-duck premier was a
    dangerous political play to make. Harris had taken a fair
    bit of heat for his backroom maneuverings on behalf of the
    North Bay consortium (see Pulling the Trigger HighGrader
    March 2001). With his party and his reputation in rough
    waters, the Premier didn¹t need to be outed in 
    his home town
    for promises he made to the consortium  many of 
    whom were
    known friends.
       
    Undeterred by the Premier¹s public rejection, McGuinty
    then called on the Environment Ministry to intervene. The
    Ministry, run by leadership hopeful Elizabeth Witmer, said
    no, as did Environment Commissioner (and fellow North Bay
    boy) Gord Miller.
       
    With days ticking away to the TO vote, Gordon McGuinty
    was running out of options. The consortium¹s frustration
    with Harris was made abundantly clear in a full page 
    ad in
    the North Bay Nugget that read ³Where¹s
     Mike Harris When
    You Need Him?²     The very next 
    day they received their
    answer when Harris¹ faithful lieutenant Chris Hodgson
    stepped into the fray. Hodgson took Toronto media completely
    off guard when he mused about ordering a review of the
    Toronto plan. ³All options are on the table²,
     said Hodgson
    to a surprised press ³including the Adams 
    Mine.²     And on
    what possible grounds did the Tories see intervening?
    Hodgson replied using the marketing slogan of the 
    Adams Mine
    consortium  ³We should have a Made in 
    Ontario Solution²
    said Hodgson.
       
    Hodgson¹s threatened intervention reawakened the Against
    the Adams Mine coalition and Toronto media were once again
    buzzing about Tory interference in bringing back the dump.
       
    But the media heat was all too much for Hodgson who
    retreated from the debate as fast as he could.
     
    The final vote came on December 4th. City Councillors seemed
    determined to nail the Adams Mine lid shut and pour concrete
    on the coffin. Councillor Pitfield stood up and made
    reference to Mayor ³Annoy² of Kirkland Lake (the
    mispronunciation could have been accidental). Lastman
    reiterated his famous ³the Adams Mine is d-e-d²
     phrase even
    more pointedly. ³Kirkland Lake is d-e-d, 
    dead,² he said.
    Soon after, Council voted 38-2 to sign the Republic deal.
       
    The indefatigable Gordon McGuinty dismissed the vote.
    ³Rest assured, the Adams Mine is not off the 
    table.² Within
    days he was talking about raising fish in the Adams Mine
    waters, but only as a stop-gap until he opened the 
    pits for
    garbage.
       
    The morning after the vote, however, KL Council met and
    quietly voted to take their ³offer² off the table.
    Said Mayor Enouy, ³It doesn¹t preclude us 
    from ever bringing
    it back but what it does is send a message, I think, to
    Toronto.²
     
    .